Effective IT Project Management: I Know It When I See It

by Scott Booher on June 8, 2009

IT Project Management seems to be one of the more difficult, etherial roles to pin down and define – there are as many best practices and traits for success as there are people offering those opinions.

Certainly the PMO training, certifications and an understanding (and use) of standard PM methodologies are important, but in many cases there doesn’t seem to be a high correlation between formal training received and actual effectiveness on the ground. Many of my peers have commented on the large “standard deviation” in PM effectiveness on their own teams, and we’ve all heard the reports of 25% – 50% failure rates for IT projects, not a great statistic.

I‘ve had the good fortune to work with many excellent project managers over the years, but was never easily able to articulate those traits that separated out the really effective ones from the rest. I am thinking of a popular old quote from a 1964 Supreme Court case, in what was surely an uncomfortable day of trying to define what “obscenity” was (with pictures), Justice Potter Stewart said:

“I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced . . . [b]ut I know it when I see it “

So what is it that makes for a truly effective project manager? A search of the consulting and project management sites yields a lot of good ideas, including:

The Basics – It’s all in getting the project basics right, including items such as clarity of roles and responsibilities, communication plans, project documents, the diligent use of the chosen methodology and the reporting process to management and stakeholders.

Level of Oversight – The trick is in determining the appropriate closeness with which to track the developers and other project participants, hands-on versus hands-off. Do they know what they are doing? If so, leave them alone and let them create their best work, if not, watch them like a hawk.

More Business Focus – The key is to focus heavily on the “business side”, including the minimum number of business executives you’ll want to have as sponsors on any project, and measuring your progress against their expectations for delivery, rather than any IT-focused measures commonly found in the project documents.

Scope Planning – If you can successfully manage scope and keep it from getting away from you, then you have indeed cracked the code, and everything else should fall into place.

Defining Success – Figure out what success looks like, and measure yourself constantly against that goal, utilizing your tools and methodologies only as means to that end, rather than deliverables in themselves. You don’t deliver projects, or project documents; you deliver solutions to your customers.

Learning From Failures – Spend an appropriate amount of time on the back-end of each project, particularly those that don’t meet expectations in some way, to determine what went wrong. Establish a feedback loop to incorporate those learnings into future initiatives, customizing the approach for your team and the organization you work within.

Being Flexible – The tools are just the starting point to support the project; you’ll need to figure out what is required for each initiative, whether it is more business involvement, swapping out resources, tweaks to your development methodology or other changes to make it successful.

Focusing on Challenges – Spend the bulk of your energy on identifying and moving through the challenges the team is facing in real-time. Global Knowledge has a good post that suggests:

“When the team is together, routinely and continually find out what the barriers are.
Simply ask:
• What’s working well on this project?
• What’s getting in our way?
• What can we be doing differently?
• What can I be doing differently?”

…and then figure out what is needed to move the ball forward. One nit I have with this same post, and a notion that I have seen repeated elsewhere is:

“Most project managers see themselves as primarily score keepers who stay on top of what’s going on. That’s called managing.”

There are perhaps too many individuals who focus solely on score keeping and reporting while viewing this as “managing” a project. Managing includes all of the above capabilities, and especially pushing through challenges. Without that, its a Project Coordinator role (not that there’s anything wrong with that.) Both roles are valuable, but lets be clear about the differences. A lot of trouble arises when a leader thinks she has assigned a Project Manager to an important initiative, and immediately begins to have project statistics “punted” back at her, with an expectation that she will step in to see what the issues are and find a way to get things back on track.  This can lead to an uncomfortable “…you must not understand, THIS IS WHAT I HIRED YOU FOR..” conversation.

What the above list suggests to me is that the Project Management role overlaps many of the traits valuable in any senior leader:

  • A great set of skills brought to the table (tools), and the confidence to leverage them
  • Always fits the approach to the situation at hand
  • Understands that methodologies are only a starting point
  • Comfortable in multiple roles (motivator, drill-sergeant, analyst, facilitator, salesperson)
  • Does not shirk from challenges, but rather seeks them out to be eliminated
  • Endlessly resourceful, does not give up easily
  • Takes real ownership, seeking to solve as many challenges as possible before passing an issue on to others, or up the chain of command

I have always thought of the project management track as an excellent place to source future leaders, because of the breadth of challenges faced and capabilities required. I feel strongly that this is a role where great talent should be rewarded as such, and that we should fight the tendency to gravitate toward the mean in compensation.

I’m interested in your thoughts or additions to this list. Do you have similar expectations of your project managers?

Your comments are welcome. If this post was helpful, you might like to subscribe to the RSS feed, sign up for weekly updates via email or follow me on Twitter.

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

Art Petty June 8, 2009 at 1:47 pm

Scott, I really enjoyed this post. It resonates on many levels, particularly on your last point as a great place to source future leaders. As a former sw company exec, I don’t have the formal project certifications that so many of the great professionals have, but I have long been an advocate of the project manager as a leader. I blog on this frequently and recently published a short, free, no registration required e-book called Leadership and the Project Manager in case anyone is interested in exploring the topic futher.

Thanks again for this post. I’m now an rss subscriber and look forward to following you here and on Twitter. -Art

Reply

Scott Booher June 8, 2009 at 2:06 pm
Peter Kretzman June 8, 2009 at 3:10 pm

Excellent post, Scott. “Pushing through challenges” is about as good a three-word précis of project management as I can imagine.

That said, your recommendation of asking the team about what isn’t working is both laudable and requiring a caveat: I’ve worked with teams where sometimes the most highly effective contributors are what I’d have to call constant carpers. They tend to have a point, but often it’s only about one time in five. The one time in five pays, perhaps, for the four-out-of-five times they’re just complaining, but it doesn’t always feel like that at the time. Just sayin’. :)

Reply

Scott Booher June 8, 2009 at 5:02 pm

Peter,

Thanks for the comment and I agree, this is a situation I have seen as well. Another “growth opportunity” for the PM to negotiate through the four-out-of-five in order to get to the nugget of value…

Reply

JohnFMoore June 8, 2009 at 4:02 pm

Good post on CIOPedia (@scottbooher) regarding effective IT Project Management: http://bit.ly/nXY2a

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

Reply

Chris Curran June 8, 2009 at 4:23 pm

Nice post Scott. I think to be a great project manager, you must also have domain knowledge so that you can truly manage – prioritize, make trade-offs, know when to ask for help, etc.

Another item I would add to your “traits” list is that a great PM seeks out issues versus being afraid of bad news. One mentor of mine used to offer $20 in team meetings for the “best” issue. Focusing on the good news to try to look good or because you are afraid to tell the project sponsors is a death sentence.

-Chris

Reply

Scott Booher June 8, 2009 at 5:16 pm

Chris,

Thanks for the comment, and this is a good add to the list. I think I have seen this behavior the most in organizations where the culture is one of “only good news flows up” but it happens everywhere. My experience has been that, if the leader/exec treats all issues with a “can-do, let’s solve this together” attitude, the PM team begins to learn over time that solving the issues is really their primary value-add, and not something to be avoided…

Reply

CheyennePeddle June 9, 2009 at 12:01 am

How do we identify effective Project Management? http://bit.ly/dhuQz #CIO #IT #CEO

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

Reply

Jeremy Lutz June 9, 2009 at 8:37 am

Great post! I am getting ready to undertake my first project as a manager. Your post provides great counsel. I especially like the thoughts on pushing through challenges, not just being a coordinator. I think this will be the hardest part as a first time project manager. Thank goodness I have some great examples to follow.

I will also be following you on twitter.

Thanks for the book Art. Going to download it now.

Reply

Steve Berg June 9, 2009 at 12:12 pm

Great post Scott. I believe the success of the IT Department is largely influenced by the quality of the IT Project Managers. In my experience, these are the people that work most closely with the rest of the business and set the stage for how the business works with IT. I’ve had experiences with poor Project Managers (either poor communicators or not able to understand the business) that have actually pushed the business away from wanting to deal with IT! Conversely, I have also had excellent PMs working for me and the feedback on them from the Business is incredibly positive and I believe it’s because the Business believes finally IT understands them and will create a solution for them that actually fits their needs!

I’m going to forward this post out to my PM team to make sure they understand what it takes!!

Reply

Scott Booher June 9, 2009 at 12:21 pm

Great point Steve, the PM can be the primary interface/liaison to the business in a lot of cases. How that relationship goes, so goes the partnership and the customer’s perception of your IT shop…

Reply

Arnold Testa June 9, 2009 at 11:00 pm

It’s simple, really. Do you know the business reason for which the project has been approved? Do you know the business champion responsible for the project, and his/her goals? Do you know your resources, staff, budget, time, support environment? If you answer yes to all of these plan your work, execute your plan and communicate in a manner understandable to all involved.

This comment was originally posted on LinkedIn

Reply

Ed Humphrey June 10, 2009 at 8:00 am

I agree with Arnold’s comment, except that you may know these things when you start, or at any one point in time, but you need to have a process, support and discipline to manage the change in business objectives, the business champion, the stakeholders and decision makers, project staff and other resources, budget, schedules, dependencies, quality and communications. None of that seems static on any project I’ve worked on over the years… not even the relatively short and simple ones.

This comment was originally posted on LinkedIn

Reply

Wade Van House July 9, 2009 at 12:52 pm

Great post Scott (and one that is close to my heart). I especially thought your last set of bullets was right on, however looking at the very last one, it’s been my experience that sometimes organizations do not empower PMs to solve their issues.
Also, on Chris’ comment above. Having domain knowledge is always a plus, but you don’t *need* to have that knowledge to be a great PM; but you do the need the ability to be a quick study and learn what you need to know to manage effectively.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: